Anonymous asked a question:
You always seem to rebuke “conservative” types who remake Christ in their political image. What about the liberals who do the same? I remember you shared this great post about how ~Christians~ will end up not falling into neat, political distinctions, and then all I see on your blog is this not-so-subtle finger wagging at conservatives? Where’s that energy when people want to turn Jesus into an anarchist revolutionary? A communist?
Isn’t God multi-faceted? Can’t God be operating on many different levels, not just the one where He’s taking care of us ~poor minorities~, with all of our ~Immigrant Virtue~? I’m not for conservative, pro-life, MAGA Jesus but I’m also not for socialist, bleeding heart, liberal Jesus either. They’re both idols. They’re for people who wear ideological garments instead of garments of righteousness. Neither make it into the Kingdom of God.
I agree with much of what you said. I may be blind to my own bias, as many of us are, and maybe I have given disproportionate weight to one side or the other. I’d like to think I have held myself and all groups accountable, but maybe not. For that, I very much appreciate that you’re pointing this out in me. I get many things wrong, and this might be one more. I have more to learn. Having said that, I’d gently like to offer a little pushback, too.
– To me, there is no way that every side of the conversation is equally harmful. In our current political landscape, it is obvious to me that certain groups have done more harm than others. I will still love every one of them.
– Jesus had stronger words and more words for Pharisees, the scribes, the teachers, the elite, the aristocrats, and the leading class. He spoke against the abuse of money and spoke up for orphans, foreigners, widows, and the poor. He either directly or indirectly said that certain people were closer to the Kingdom of God than others. Jesus himself did quite a lot of non-subtle finger-wagging. While there are many, many types of Christians in all kinds of political and cultural categories, I think Jesus very clearly condemned certain practices.
– Without hesitation, I’ll take a “bleeding heart revolutionary Jesus” over a bigoted isolationist Jesus.
– I think your questions, as sensible as they are, are a bit leading and binary. That’s called a “double-bind.” I’m guilty of doing this, too, and it does not lead to any helpful dialogue. (In fact, I did a double-bind in my previous point. It’s a very easy thing to do.)
– Calling out one political party or practice does not automatically mean that I endorse the “other group” entirely. That’s also a double-bind. It’s impossible to write a super-nuanced cover-all-bases type of post for every single point.
– I’m certain you already know this, but political disagreement doesn’t mean we can’t be friends. I live in Florida. It’s one of the most divisive and ridiculous states in the country. What’s more ridiculous is the idea that disagreement has to mean we automatically hate each other. It does not.
– Here’s a funny story. One time after I gave a sermon, somebody came up to me and was super angry. He was “conservative.” He said, “Why did you single me out? Why were you talking to me?” Of course, I really wasn’t. Then another person came up to me who identified as “liberal.” He said, “Why are you undermining us? Did you write this sermon at me?” Both were fuming mad for different reasons.
Many of us tend to read into things as we are, not as they are. I’m not saying this is what you’re doing. But I graciously want to raise the possibility that everyone does project many of their own fears, anxieties, animosities, and grudges at others. It is possible that just as you assumed I was categorizing Christians with my own filter, you have also categorized what I wrote with your own filter. I am guilty of doing the same thing, too. And it seems no matter which way I write, I’m always going to make someone angry. Sometimes that’s my fault and I should’ve said it better. Other times it’s misheard and then a false assumption is made.
In the end, calling out a political practice, or even a whole party, is necessary as followers of Jesus. I feel that I have not done my part in speaking up very well, as most of my writing is not political at all. I blame myself for not raising my voice a bit more. I believe we ought to be the most critical and most gentle of people when it comes to our social and political landscape. That will mean, inevitably, making a few people angry.
Photo from Unsplash
5 thoughts on “Are You Secretly a Liberal Who Hates Conservatives?”
You’re an interesting man
LikeLiked by 1 person
Really interesting thoughts, Pastor, and I follow you for the most part. A Christian should be willing and ready to line up with those marginalized or suffering. I’m not clear about the political angle of the question, thought, since Jesus took no sides politically. Jesus scolded the religious leaders of his day because they “sat in Moses seat” and expounded on how God saw things, but were so wrong and harsh.
As I read it, Jesus said almost nothing about government policies, political leaders, or the Roman military police. Not one word about government incompetence or favoritism, no sermons about police brutality, no speaking out against the barbaric method of execution — which he knew he would soon face himself. He was truly the Supreme Ambassador of another government.
I think it’s hard for us, living in our politically charged world, to really get a handle on that.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Dear Mr. Park,
I contact you on behalf of En Plo Editions, a specialist publishing company from Greece, that focuses on theology, history and academic works, as well as fiction and children’s literature. We have read your recently published work “How Hard It Really Is” and we are interested in translating it into Greek and publishing it in the Greek Market. Could you be so kind to inform me whether you hold the rights for this title and furthermore whether you can grant us permission for this translation?
Looking forward to hearing from you,
Like you seem to do, I try to examine the more in my own eye before pointing out the speck in another’s. I fail more often than I catch you failing – maybe because of the log in my eye?
Ah, this Christ following stuff is hard.
LikeLiked by 1 person