In reference to this.
Feel free to skip around on this post.
Anonymous questions:
– Hi. I enjoyed your last post. I am a woman and have been struggling with Scripture for a long, long time about complementarianism vs egalitarianism in the church. Despite my struggling, my conviction is the former. I am guessing yours is as well. So can you give me your view (and on submission, historical context of Paul’s teachings, etc)? Also, what if there are few men in a certain area unable to do pastoral work for w/e reason.. is it better to have a woman do this work rather than no one?
– In reference to your recent post about qualifications for pastors, could you also address this issue: must pastors be male?
– Can you explain 1 Timothy 2:11?
Please allow me the humility to throw down some groundwork for our discussion. Also please know that I am one person interpreting a controversial text, and disagreements here shouldn’t lead to division. Feel free to skip around if you read on.
I can’t continue unless I explain neo-feminism. It is a form of feminist values gone wrong, in which instead of equal rights calls for a debasing of masculine values and a superiority of feminine ones.
I have little problem with feminism since its true spirit is to heal the historical deficit of women’s rights. But neo-feminism is a clever corruption, often subtle and much more entrenched in our culture and mentalities than we presume, as we’ll soon see.
We are also such a product of our times that we’re blinded to much of the ideas that have clawed into our psyches. C.S. Lewis’ famous argument of chronological snobbery is helpful to read here.
No doubt that I will say disagreeable things and I don’t claim to have all the answers. Yet I stand on these convictions because I don’t want to be a relativist passionless fool who compromises in a politically correct culture of catering. As best as I know how, these are my personal biblical foundations. Please seek for yourself as well.
J.S. Park: Hospital Chaplain, Skeptical Christian 