Book Review: Beautiful Outlaw

Beautiful Outlaw
By John Eldredge

Beautiful Outlaw is a frustrating, if at times well-written and unique journey, into the life of the most famous person in the history of the world. Such a daunting task is not lost on John Eldredge, who bypasses the doctrine and gets right at the heart of Jesus, not always successfully.

Eldredge, the manly man’s author of Wild At Heart and Captivating, has written another manly, chest-thumping work. With an intriguing title and a great premise, Eldredge presents vignettes of Jesus in his earthly ministry. Eldredge is neither a theologian nor scholar, and this shows in his Hollywood-like style of dialogue and details. It all goes wrong pretty quickly.

We often project our own personality onto Jesus himself, as argued by Scot McKnight and counter-argued by N.T. Wright. This happens frequently in Beautiful Outlaw, as Eldredge’s well known personal theology takes center stage. Though he continually wants Jesus to “be himself,” we suspect this is hardly the case throughout the book. To at once claim Jesus as his own person and then label him “playful, cunning, disruptive,” and other post-millennial terms is not only contradictory but inadvertently undermines Eldredge’s point. I get what he’s trying to do, but he fails quite hard.

Eldredge also beats up the “religious,” never defining them but gut-punching them at every opportunity. It’s very vogue these days to use the Pharisee as a religious boogeyman, the equivalent of saying Nazi, and then to exclaim how not to be like them. The first few times I agreed, but the next one-hundred or so verbal smackdowns was eye-rolling. Eldredge states that categorizing people with partisan dismissal is a religious tactic, but then he himself casually dismisses the religious group and never once shows grace their way. Traditional, church-raised, Southern-value-abiding, well-intentioned, religious folk need Jesus too. It’s an immature Christian who pits two sides against each other and claims one as superior. Eldredge’s spiteful bitterness is cringe-inducing.

The main problem here is that the ideas are presented in such a way that bullies you into believing: If you don’t agree with Eldredge’s take on Jesus, you got it all wrong. While this is probably not Eldredge’s agenda, his entire presentation is forced down your throat. The last couple chapters are rife with this sort of mean spirit, and his “vivid encounters” is so off the rails of orthodoxy that I needed a shower from the New Age grime. The irritating thing is that Eldredge would ridicule me for disagreeing with him, and in fact has already done so with preemptive defenses built into his work.

If I have been too hard on him, I must confess that portions of Beautiful Outlaw are written well, with the expected poetic grandeur (and pretentiousness) of Eldredge’s previous works. The stories of Jesus’ life, while presented haphazardly with no cohesive order, are still shown in a fresh way. We really do see the humanity of Jesus shine through here, and if it weren’t for Eldredge’s overbearing aggression towards “religious” people, then the book could have really been a classic.

In particular, when Eldredge talks about Jesus as Faithful and True, I was stirred by Jesus’ all-too-honest nature: he never had to hide anything and was exactly who he said he was. No other human can make that claim. We all bury ourselves in labels and manners and conformity. This was a great view into Jesus that shows why the Christian life is about bearing Jesus’ image in sanctification.

Bottom Line:
I really expected more from Eldredge’s work. I had even purchased a second copy for a friend, excited for more intimacy with Christ. If only Eldredge could get a re-do. While there are some great portions here, we still await the insightful look into Jesus’ humanity.


5 thoughts on “Book Review: Beautiful Outlaw

  1. Interesting view. I wouldn’t venture to say he “bullies” people into his ideas but I find that I have to constantly remind myself to read critically.


  2. This review pretty much explains what I feel as I was reading the book. I don’t know if I was just being critical but I feel really disturbed as I continue to read it.
    It feels like a hard sell of his idea. And though he tells us to let go of our limitations of Jesus, of pre-conceptions of Him, here he is trying to sell and limit me of his own conception of Jesus.
    I’m not saying he is completely wrong because he got some things right. And the first chapter was so good in convincing me to experience the “real” Jesus, making me wonder why the book has not ended there when the best way to experience Jesus is to experience him myself first hand that reading another person’s account of Him doesn’t suffice.


  3. Wow. Did you read the whole book? I agree to a point. There is certainly Eldredge’s own opinion…but hey it’s his book, and personally I believe the point he is making over and over again is that: yes, we are making comparisons with our own personality and Jesus’. We can do this because we are made in His image! We must have some things in common. I love the way Eldredge get the reader to step into the humanity of the Lord. He was human. That is something that we all know, but to see it up close and to picture Him as one of your own mates is something different, and special. Eldredge doesn’t beat up the religious, but he does draw a line in the sand between religion and Christ, and anyone who truly walks with God would have to agree that religion is the farthest thing from truth. Religion has rules, standards, ideals, judgements. Worship on Sunday, dress modestly, marry a Christian, etc. Religion all too often follows the letter of the law, rather than the spirit. The entire point of Jesus was to free us from law! Christ couldn’t care less what we wear, but He cares whether or not we offer our shirt to a brother in need of one. He wants us to rest in Him, but that doesn’t have to happen in a temple…and it certainly doesn’t have to be on the Sabbath.
    I hope that you will read the book again with a lightened heart. Your comments make me wonder if you read with a skeptical eye. It seems that you are personally taking offense to Eldredge’s position on the “religious”, and I don’t think that that was what was intended. Anytime I’ve ever been put on the defensive I know deep down that I may have something to learn.


    1. You’re right, I can definitely take a look at it again. I’ve enjoyed Edlredge’s other work and I was probably too harsh on this one. Still, I found it hard to believe it was from Eldredge. I vibe with all you’re saying, but the last sentence doesn’t resonate entirely. I think “defensive” might be bad, but “discernment” is a different matter.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.